Match Context
Liverpool sit 5th in the Premier League on 55 points from 32 games — three points behind 4th-place Aston Villa with five matches to play. Three wins from those five seal Champions League qualification. This is their sole competitive fixture this week and rotation is not an option.
Crystal Palace are 13th on 43 points, safe from relegation and with no realistic route into European places through the league. They face Fiorentina in the UEFA Conference League semi-final next week. Glasner may treat this trip as a squad-management opportunity — rotation risk is assessed as High for the visitors.
This is the fourth meeting between the sides this season. Crystal Palace have won in each of the three previous encounters: on penalties after a 2-2 draw in the Community Shield, 2-1 at Selhurst Park in the league in September 2025, and 3-0 at Anfield in the EFL Cup in October 2025 (Liverpool heavily rotated in that fixture).
Team News
Liverpool
Starting GK Freddie Woodman — third choice; both regular keepers ruled out
Out Alisson Becker — hamstring (six games missed)
Out Giorgi Mamardashvili — knee wound vs Everton (19 Apr)
Out Conor Bradley — season-ending knee (January)
Out Wataru Endo — long-term ankle/foot injury
Out Stefan Bajcetic — entire season, recurring injury
Out Giovanni Leoni — ACL, season-ending (September debut)
Doubt Joseph Gomez — unspecified; missed Everton derby
Crystal Palace
Out Cheick Doucoure — injury confirmed
Doubt Ismaila Sarr — availability disputed; see Conditional Flag
Rotation High risk — Conference League semi-final vs Fiorentina next week
Predicted XI (3-4-2-1): Henderson; Canvot, Lacroix, Richards; Mitchell, Wharton, Lerma, Muñoz; Pino, Sarr (pend.); Mateta
Woodman starting in goal is the single most important analytical factor in this article. Liverpool's clean-sheet probability falls significantly. Palace's route to a goal is more open than usual. A competitive, low-scoring draw — the 1-1 outcome — is the engine's primary scenario and satisfies GG Yes, Under 2.5, and the Draw tip simultaneously.
Referee Intelligence
Referee Andy Madley VAR: Neil Davies · 4th: Paul Tierney
Cards / game (PL 25/26) 3.31 YC 53 yellows + 3 reds across 16 games
Classification Low Below PL season average (~4 cards/game)
Key implication Cards 3+ at 1.27 is significantly overpriced against Madley's actual rate — assessed at ~64% vs 75.4% book fair
Appointment confirmed via the official Premier League Matchweek 34 announcement. Madley has officiated 22 Liverpool matches (W13 D6 L3) and has never shown Liverpool a red card.
Form & Head-to-Head
Head-to-Head — Anfield (Liverpool home · Venue-matched · Primary dataset)
| Date |
Competition |
Score |
Result |
GG |
O2.5 |
| 29 Oct 2025 |
EFL Cup |
0–3 |
Palace W |
No |
Yes |
| 25 May 2025 |
Premier League |
1–1 |
Draw |
Yes |
No |
| 14 Apr 2024 |
Premier League |
0–1 |
Palace W |
No |
No |
| 15 Aug 2022 |
Premier League |
1–1 |
Draw |
Yes |
No |
| 15 Jul 2022 |
Club Friendly |
2–0 |
Liverpool W |
No |
No |
PL at Anfield (last 3): Liverpool W0 · D2 · Palace W1 PL GG at Anfield: 2/3 = 67% PL O2.5 at Anfield: 0/3 = 0% Palace unbeaten in last 3 PL visits
Market Probability Table
| Verdict |
Market |
Outcome |
Odds |
My Assessment |
| Match Result — 1X2 |
| ⛔ Avoid |
Match Result |
Liverpool Win |
1.49 |
~57% — overpriced; GK crisis and Palace's unbeaten Anfield record make this significantly shorter than justified |
| 🔵 Good Bet |
Match Result |
Draw |
4.86 |
~27% — 2 of the last 3 PL meetings at Anfield were draws; Palace's compact shape can absorb pressure with Woodman in goal |
| 🟡 Speculative |
Match Result |
Crystal Palace Win |
6.18 |
~19% — underestimated; Palace have beaten Liverpool three times this season across competitions |
| GG/NG — Both Teams to Score |
| 🔵 Good Bet |
GG/NG |
GG — Yes |
1.75 |
~66% — Palace scored in all 5 recent away games; Liverpool home GG 3/5 (60%); PL Anfield H2H GG 2/3 (67%); Woodman in goal boosts Palace's scoring chance |
| ⛔ Avoid |
GG/NG |
NG — No |
2.10 |
~34% — Palace have scored in every one of their last 5 away fixtures |
| Over/Under Goals |
| ⛔ Avoid |
Over/Under |
Over 2.5 |
1.58 |
~57% — last 3 PL at Anfield are all under 2.5; Liverpool home O2.5 rate only 2/5 (40%); overpriced |
| 🔵 Good Bet |
Over/Under |
Under 2.5 |
2.40 |
~43% — H2H Anfield (0/3 over 2.5 in last 3 PL) is the strongest single signal; compatible with GG Yes via a 1-1 outcome |
| ⚪ No Edge |
Over/Under |
Over 3.5 |
2.45 |
~35% — no actionable gap at current price |
| ⚪ No Edge |
Over/Under |
Under 3.5 |
1.57 |
~65% — slight positive gap, below actionable threshold |
| Draw No Bet |
| ⛔ Avoid |
Draw No Bet |
Liverpool |
1.20 |
~75% — same negative Liverpool signal; poor value at price |
| 🔵 Good Bet |
Draw No Bet |
Crystal Palace |
4.70 |
~25% — Palace's win probability relative to Liverpool's exceeds the book's DNB pricing |
| Asian Handicap |
| ⛔ Avoid |
Asian Handicap |
Home −0.5 |
1.46 |
Same negative gap as Liverpool Win; structural derivative |
| 🟡 Speculative |
Asian Handicap |
Away +0.5 |
2.65 |
~46% Palace not losing — combines Draw and Palace Win signals; H2H and form support |
| ⚪ No Edge |
Asian Handicap |
Away +1.0 |
2.05 |
~44% — fairly priced at this handicap level |
| Corners |
| 🔵 Good Bet |
Corners O/U |
Over 9.5 |
1.64 |
~61% — Liverpool pressing vs Palace's deep 3-4-2-1 block; book prices Liverpool home O5.5 at 63% fair, Palace to add 2-4 corners |
| ⚪ No Edge |
Corners O/U |
Under 9.5 |
2.15 |
~39% — complement; no edge |
| Cards (YC = 1 booking · RC = 2 bookings) |
| ⛔ Avoid |
Match Cards |
3+ bookings |
1.27 |
~64% assessed vs 75.4% fair — Madley's PL average of 3.31 YC/game makes this significantly overpriced (−11.4% gap) |
| ⚪ No Edge |
Match Cards |
4+ bookings |
1.65 |
~40% — aligned with Madley's profile |
Market Analysis
Draw — assessed ~27%, gap +7.19%. The market prices the draw at 4.86, implying ~20% probability. The last three Premier League meetings at Anfield produced two draws (1-1 in August 2022, 1-1 in May 2025) and one Palace win (0-1 in April 2024). Liverpool have not beaten Crystal Palace at Anfield in the Premier League since September 2021. With Woodman starting in goal and Palace on an eight-match unbeaten run, the draw probability is assessed materially higher at ~27%. Confidence: Medium.
GG Yes — assessed ~66%, gap +11.46% — CONDITIONAL. Crystal Palace have scored in all five of their last five away games across all competitions, including 3-1 at Tottenham and 1-2 at Manchester United in the Premier League. Liverpool's home GG rate this season is 60% (3/5), and the PL Anfield H2H shows GG in 2 of the last 3 meetings (67%). Woodman in goal significantly increases the probability of Palace finding the net. The assessment of ~66% gives a +11.46% gap — the largest positive gap in this analysis, close to the 12% Very Strong threshold. Confidence capped at Medium due to Sarr availability dispute. If Sarr is confirmed fit, the signal stack approaches Best Bet territory.
Under 2.5 — assessed ~43%, gap +6.79%. Counterintuitively, Under 2.5 sits alongside GG Yes. The primary resolution of both is a 1-1 draw — the engine's most likely single scoreline. The Anfield PL H2H evidence is unambiguous: 0 of the last 3 meetings went over 2.5 goals (0-1, 1-1, 1-1). Liverpool's own home O2.5 rate is 2/5 (40%). Despite the Woodman factor, structural evidence firmly supports a low-scoring match. Under 2.5 and GG Yes are not contradictory — they intersect cleanly at a 1-1 outcome. Confidence: Medium.
Liverpool Win — assessed ~57%, gap −7.61% — AVOID. The 1.49 price implies ~64.6% win probability. Woodman, Palace's form, and the specific Anfield H2H trend place the actual probability closer to 57%. The market was calibrated for a Liverpool team with a functioning top-flight goalkeeper. AVOID at 1.49.
Over 2.5 — assessed ~57%, gap −6.29% — AVOID. The H2H at Anfield in the Premier League shows 0/3 over 2.5 in recent meetings. Liverpool's home O2.5 rate is 2/5. Despite the Woodman factor nudging goal expectation upward, the book's 63.29% fair price is above the assessed probability. AVOID at 1.58.
Corners Over 9.5 — assessed ~61%, gap +4.27%. Liverpool's pressing style at Anfield naturally generates corner volume. Crystal Palace's deep defensive block invites wide play and crossing — producing corners rather than goal kicks. The book prices Liverpool home corners O5.5 at ~63% fair, implying 6+ corners alone. Palace contribute 2-4 from their own phases. Ten or more total corners is a structural consequence of this tactical pairing. Confidence: Medium.
Match Cards 3+ — assessed ~64%, gap −11.4% — AVOID. Andy Madley averages 3.31 yellow cards per game in the Premier League this season. Using a Poisson model with λ = 3.3, the probability of reaching 3+ booking points is approximately 64%, against a book fair price of 75.4%. An 11.4% negative gap driven by a structural mismatch between the referee's profile and the market price. Confidence: Medium.
DNB Crystal Palace — assessed ~25%, gap +4.65% — CONDITIONAL. When the draw is removed, Palace's win probability relative to Liverpool's exceeds the book's DNB pricing. Assessed at 25% against 20.35% fair — a +4.65% gap. Consistent with and derived from the same signal stack as the Draw and Crystal Palace Win recommendations.
Betting Tips
🔵 Good Bet
🔵
Good Bet Draw — Match Result
Odds 4.86
The last three Premier League meetings between these teams at Anfield produced a 1-1 draw (Aug 2022), a 0-1 Palace win (Apr 2024), and a 1-1 draw (May 2025). Liverpool have not won this fixture at Anfield in the league since September 2021. Against a Palace side on an 8-match unbeaten run, in disciplined 3-4-2-1, and with Woodman between the posts for the home side — the 4.86 draw price significantly undervalues a competitive stalemate.
🔵
Good Bet — Conditional GG Yes — Both Teams to Score
Odds 1.75
⚠️ Conditional on Sarr availability — see Conditional Flags. If Sarr is absent, this tip drops to No Edge.
Crystal Palace have scored in every one of their last five away fixtures across all competitions — a perfect 5/5 GG rate. In their two Premier League away games in the current snapshot they scored at Tottenham (3-1) and at Manchester United (1-2). Liverpool will score — Salah, Isak and Wirtz against a third-choice keeper is close to a certainty. Liverpool's home GG rate is 60% (3/5) and PL Anfield H2H returns GG in 2 of 3 (67%). The gap at +11.46% is the highest in this analysis.
Core scenario: 1-1. This satisfies GG Yes, Under 2.5 and the Draw tip simultaneously.
🔵
Good Bet Under 2.5 Goals
Odds 2.40
The last three Premier League meetings at Anfield all ended under 2.5 goals: 0-1, 1-1, 1-1. Liverpool's own home last-five returns just 2 games over 2.5 out of five (40%). Despite Woodman in goal slightly increasing goal expectation, the structural Anfield evidence points firmly toward a low-scoring game. Crucially, Under 2.5 and GG Yes are not contradictory — the 1-1 outcome satisfies both, and that is the engine's primary predicted scenario.
🔵
Good Bet — Conditional Crystal Palace — Draw No Bet
Odds 4.70
⚠️ Conditional on Sarr availability. Do not combine with the Draw tip on the same slip — they are near-contradictory accumulator legs.
When the draw possibility is stripped out, Palace's win probability relative to Liverpool's is higher than the book prices in the DNB market. Assessed at ~25% vs book fair ~20.35% — a +4.65% gap. Best used as a standalone speculation, not alongside the Draw recommendation.
🔵
Good Bet Corners Over 9.5
Odds 1.64
Liverpool's high-press attacking style at Anfield consistently generates corner volume. Crystal Palace's deep 3-4-2-1 defensive block invites wide play and crossing, producing corners rather than goal kicks. The book's own Liverpool home corner pricing (O5.5 at ~63% fair) projects Liverpool alone reaching 6+ corners. Palace add a further 2-4 from their own set-piece phases. Ten or more total corners is the structural outcome of this tactical match-up.
🟡 Speculative
🟡
Speculative Crystal Palace Win — 1X2
Odds 6.18
Assessed at ~19% against the book's fair 15.58% — a +3.42% speculative edge. Palace have beaten Liverpool three times this season, carry genuine attacking quality, and face a third-choice goalkeeper. Anfield's atmosphere and Liverpool's CL motivation make an outright Palace win the least likely of the three results, but the 6.18 price does offer value at the edge.
🟡
Speculative Asian Handicap Away +0.5
Odds 2.65
Palace not losing — assessed at ~46% (draw + Palace win) against book fair ~37.7%. Bridges both positive signals into a single outcome at wider odds. Gap +7.43% on a raw basis, but classified Speculative given its derived nature and the lower confidence on Palace's outright win leg.
⚪ No Edge
Over 3.5 Goals @ 2.45 ~35%; no actionable gap
Under 3.5 Goals @ 1.57 ~65%; slight positive gap below threshold
Asian Handicap Away +1.0 @ 2.05 ~44%; fairly priced
Double Chance X2 @ 2.50 ~43%; gap exists but derived from parent signals
Match Cards 4+ @ 1.65 ~40%; aligned with Madley's profile
⛔ Avoid
Liverpool Win 1X2 @ 1.49 −7.61% gap; GK crisis and H2H trend make this overpriced
Over 2.5 Goals @ 1.58 −6.29% gap; 0/3 over 2.5 in last 3 PL at Anfield
NG (No BTTS) @ 2.10 −11.46% gap; Palace scored in all 5 recent away games
DNB Liverpool @ 1.20 −4.65% gap; poor value at price
Match Cards 3+ @ 1.27 −11.4% gap; Madley too lenient to justify this price
Asian Handicap Home −0.5 @ 1.46 Structural derivative of Liverpool Win; same negative gap
Missing Markets
| Market |
Reason |
Analytical Note |
| Anytime / First Goalscorer |
Players tab not submitted |
Salah (9 PL goals, 24 apps) and Mateta (10 PL goals) are the primary candidates. Sarr has scored in all three meetings with Liverpool this season — his status is the key variable for scorer markets. |
| First Half Result (1X2) |
Odds not included in submission |
Category B market. Liverpool typically lead or are level at the break at Anfield. No assessment without odds. |
| 1X2 — 1UP / 2UP |
Category D — excluded |
Platform-specific early settlement derivative of 1X2. No independent signal framework applicable. |
| EarlyGoals markets |
Category D — excluded |
Combined early-trigger plus Over/Under with non-standard settlement. Outside engine scope. |
| Correct Score / HT/FT / Exact Goals |
Category D — granular |
No reliable probability framework for narrow score predictions. |
Supplementary Market Notes
GG/NG 2+ (Both score 2+ goals each) — 4.96 Yes / 1.14 No Given the primary scenario of ~2 total goals, both teams scoring twice each is unlikely. NG 2+ No at 1.14 is correctly priced. No Edge.
Double Chance X2 (Draw or Palace Win) @ 2.50 Assessed ~43%. A +5.3% gap on a raw calculation, but this market is a direct structural derivative of the Draw and Palace Win signals — not an independent market. Classified as No Edge on the margin; the parent tips (Draw 4.86, Crystal Palace Win 6.18) offer better odds for equivalent risk.
Crystal Palace Team Cards 2+ @ 1.42 Implied fair ~70.4%. Madley's lenient profile implies Palace's expected share (~1.6-1.7 booking points) puts probability of 2+ Palace cards closer to 49-54%. Significant negative gap. Avoid for the cards-specific bettor.
1st Half GG/NG — GG Yes @ 4.10 For both teams to score in the first 45 minutes, Palace need an early goal at a high-pressure venue. Palace typically start cautiously in away games. No Edge at 4.10.
Odd/Even Total Goals — Odd 1.92 / Even 1.89 Near-identical prices. No analytical signal can reliably differentiate. No Edge on both sides.
Accumulator Builder Notes
Core Combination — The "1-1 Trifecta" Draw (4.86) × GG Yes (1.75) × Under 2.5 (2.40) — combined odds ~20.4. All three are satisfied simultaneously by a 1-1 score, which is the engine's single most probable specific outcome. These three tips are highly correlated — this is a concentrated bet on one scenario, not diversified accumulation.
⚠️ Correlation Warning — GG Yes & Under 2.5 GG Yes and Under 2.5 are positively correlated. The only way both land is if exactly 2 goals are scored (1-1 being the primary route). Combining these two legs provides minimal independent diversification. Treat them as a single "1-1 competitive draw" signal rather than two separate tips.
⚠️ Do NOT combine: DNB Crystal Palace + Draw DNB Crystal Palace requires Palace to WIN for a payout; draws are voided. Combining DNB Palace with the Draw tip means the draw leg wins but DNB voids. These are contradictory legs on the same slip.
Corners O9.5 (1.64) as a standalone acca addition Corners Over 9.5 has no correlation with the goals or result markets and adds genuine diversification. Adding it to Draw + GG Yes gives combined odds ~14.7. The Crystal Palace Win at 6.18 adds further leverage if used in a small-stake speculative acca.
Conditional Flags
⚠️ FLAG 1 — Ismaila Sarr Availability (High Priority)
Markets affected: GG Yes (Good Bet) · DNB Crystal Palace (Good Bet) · Crystal Palace Win (Speculative).
WhoScored and Ladbrokes predicted XIs (published 22 April) include Sarr in Palace's starting lineup. A separate aggregator source (published 23 April) lists him as suspended. The conflict is unresolved at time of analysis.
If Sarr starts: All three tips stand at their published verdicts. He has scored in all three competitive meetings with Liverpool this season and carries seven career goals in nine appearances against them.
If Sarr is absent: GG Yes drops to ~52-54% assessed — gap narrows to No Edge. DNB Crystal Palace drops to borderline No Edge. Crystal Palace Win remains Speculative but at lower conviction.
⚠️ FLAG 2 — Crystal Palace Rotation Depth
Markets affected: GG Yes · DNB Crystal Palace · Crystal Palace Win.
The predicted XIs assume Mateta, Pino and Sarr (pending) all start. If Glasner rotates heavily ahead of the Conference League semi-final, Palace's attacking output reduces. The GG and Palace attack tips assume a competitive near-full-strength attacking lineup. A heavily rotated XI changes the Palace scoring probability and should prompt review of the two conditional Good Bet tips.
ℹ️ FLAG 3 — Freddie Woodman in Goal (Confirmed Signal)
Both Alisson Becker and Mamardashvili are confirmed unavailable. Woodman starts. This is already priced into all verdicts above — particularly the AVOID on Liverpool Win, the positive Draw signal, and the GG Yes and Under 2.5 recommendations. No further verification needed on this point.
Analysis Confidence
Overall Rating Medium
Data Status Live Search Active
Anomalies (Skill 02) 0 detected
Confidence is capped at Medium primarily due to the unresolved Sarr availability dispute, which affects two Good Bet verdicts. All other research is confirmed via live sources: Liverpool injury information sourced from Liverpool FC's official bulletin (updated 20 April), form and H2H from Flashscore, referee appointment from the official Premier League Matchweek 34 announcement. Woodman starting is confirmed and fully incorporated into all verdicts. The GG Yes assessment carries the highest gap in the analysis (+11.46%) and approaches Best Bet territory if Sarr is confirmed available.
Responsible Betting
This analysis is produced by the Betcompare engine for informational and entertainment purposes only. All betting carries financial risk and there is no guarantee of profit from any tip or recommendation published on this platform.
Our tips represent assessed value based on available statistical data, team news, and market intelligence at the time of publication. They are not guarantees of outcome. Football is unpredictable — even the strongest value bet loses regularly.
Please bet responsibly: Only bet what you can afford to lose · Never chase losses · Set a budget and stick to it · Do not bet under the influence of alcohol or emotional stress · Keep betting for entertainment, not as a source of income.
If you feel your betting is becoming a problem or is affecting your finances, relationships, or mental health, contact the National Responsible Gambling Programme (NRGP Nigeria) at nrgpnigeria.org · Helpline: 0800 NRGP. 18+ only.
Betcompare does not accept liability for any financial losses incurred as a result of acting on information published on this platform.
Share on X
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Facebook
Share on Instagram
Share via email
